Mitt Romney's Argument For Shutting Down FEMA Ripped In New York Times Editorial

Mitt Romney's Argument For Shutting Down FEMA Ripped In New York Times Editorial: "Mitt Romney's mouth once again has forced him into doing "damage control". He made it pointedly clear that he wants to eliminate FEMA on the federal level. He spoke clear English on that so you can't just take it back and say you meant something else. He wants to put in in the hands of the for-profit private sector. And if that were to happen, can yu see all sorts of disaster assistance coming with a price list: Rescue by boat - $3000; Rescue by helicopter - $9,000; Meals ready to Eat - $6 each; 1 gallon of water - $5. Price gouging would be legal if Romney ran this country. He's not a clear thinker but a would be emperor with no clothes or clear thought for running this country. Was he thinking that any natural disaster would be so mild that it wouldn't warrant federal involvement? The history of natural disaster here and abroad should have shown him the extent a tragedy can occur. This only demonstrates how out of touch he truly is. Apparently he must have missed the major earthquakes in California, Mexico and Haiti.Apparently he was watching his horse in a dressage competition while New Orleans and Mississippi was swamped with 12 feet of water. Apparently the BP oil spill was just an insignificant inconvenience to his portfolio decline that bounced right back up after he shifted some jobs from America to China. Heck of a job you're planning there Romney."

'via Blog this'