Ghostbusters 2016 – A Post Analysis
Review
A film, an icon to many who've come to
admire it and recite many of the lines from it's era, was remade into
a load of shit. I thought I wouldn't be so crude but I have to when
it came to the new Ghostbusters 2016. At first I felt I must
approach this with a sound reason and argument about the merits of
the film but as I got to that line, both figuratively and literally,
there had to be no sugarcoating the film. With a running time of one
hour and fifty six minutes, did I laugh one time? No! Did I
register a smirk? No! I was expecting this film to warm up after
the first fifteen minutes to get its sea legs and find its rhythm but
that never happened. It just kept plodding along.
I went to the Internet bible to the
film industry, IMDB, to see what the average person had to say about
the film because I wanted to be sure first that I wasn't imagining
things and my criticism wasn't being jaded. Well, there were many
and the first page held a good sampling with what I had observed.
IMDB have star ratings ranging from one to ten. Everyone one of
those reviews had given Ghostbusters 2016 a rating of one star and
that's the lowest it can go. So I find it amazing that overall the
film scored a 5.6 review. Clearly some of those must be people who
work for the studios salting the reviews.
Paul Feig and Katie Dippold wrote this
malicious mess of a script and Paul Feig directed it. At some point,
Columbia Pictures must have had some warnings about this film? The
trailer for the film was released on YouTube and it received the
highest negative comments of any film trailer that was ever released
on YouTube, And then the comments came in and those comments were
attributed to misogyny because the film was led by an all female
cast. That's debatable because one of the arguments was that chicks
aren't funny. They can be with the right material as some of this
cast has experienced.
The film has problems, a lot of
problems. One major problem is that it had big shoes to fill. This
movie was a toddler's size 3 trying to fill in a man's size 11. And
I would like to also stipulate that I don't fault the cast. It's the
job you are given. You do the best you can with the material that
you are given and that material was a big heaping steaming fly
swarming load of crap. So you have four women, three who are
scientist and white and one who is black and uneducated and a walking
stereotype. She worked for the MTA as a booth operator. You may not
see it this way but there was the flavor of racism with her part.
The thing that stood out for me was her language or rather her use of
the language compared to her fellow actresses. It stood out like a
sore thumb that she used the word “ain't”. That bothered me
because once again, the black person must speak like this all the
time because it would be uncool to depict a black person with any
level of education and that's why they must always speak with the
ignorance that comes with have no education. And it's not about
“speaking white” as some tends to fall to in this argument. The
dialogue with the other cast is just as bad because the film is
peppered with cliches and non-sequitur that don't make any sense. It
did nothing to move the script along or add to the meaning of the
scene.
Originally I thought did film was to
pick up from what the original had done but after seeing cameos from
the original cast, it was a blown opportunity to embrace the old with
the new. Instead we get Bill Murray, I guess, getting killed and
Ernie Hudson in the mortuary business. The music even sucked. At
least create your own music instead of remaking the original into an
ear splitting fiasco.
And while some talked about those who
had their negative opinions and the implications of misogyny, let's
talk about the misandry. Chris Hemsworth portrays the adequately
stupid receptionist. He's even more than an imbecilic moron, he's
the walking dumb with a six-pack. He's playing the Annie Potts
character and if the same had been done to her when she took the
role, the women advocacy groups would have shut the film down for
depicting her as an airhead. Annie brought a sense of purpose to the
role and defined it with honor. She was no buffoon at all but Chris
is an embarrassment so why does his role gets accepted without a
whisper of controversy? Some would say so what, but if we are to
move forward in our society, we can't keep throwing back to old
vestiges and stereotypes and expect them to be overlooked for the
sake of some lame comedy.
Watching this film wasn't a fun watch.
With the original, you had lines you could quote, “He slimmed me!”;
“Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together”; “Don't
cross the streams.”; “That's gotta be some cockroach.” See,
that was a fun film. There were no lines worth quoting with
Ghostbusters 2016 because it wasn't fun to experience and there lies
the crust with some films today, you jut don't have the fun
experience anymore. I thought the Kate McKinnon character would be a
fun watch but it was just the opposite. The lines she kept spewing
out were too much of gibberish that she and Kristen Wiig kept
describing when it came to the equipment and soon that became just
white noise. At the end of the film I was hoping for some silly
outtakes that Paul Feig and Melissa McCarthy is known for but even
that let me down. None of it was funny. How do you make a classic
original comedy and turn it into a liquefied diarrhea filled slog
fest of savage abdominal pain turning your hole raw in the process
and expect people to be entertained. You don't.